Parcourir les catégories
Explorer
Fiverr Pro
Français
$
USD
Luz Portwood
@luz_writer1
Book Editing, Ghostwriting, Ebook writing, Developmental Edit and Proofreading
États-Unis
Anglais, Espagnol, Français
À propos de moi
I’m Luz, a professional writer and editor with extensive experience across multiple genres and industries. Over the past nine years, I’ve worked on more than 300 novels, delivering high quality writing and editing Customized to each client’s vision. I take pride in producing polished, engaging work and treating every project as an opportunity to grow and refine my skills. If you’re seeking a dedicated, passionate professional to bring your ideas to life, I’d be delighted to collaborate with you.
Compétences
Luz Portwood
hors ligne •
Temps de réponse moyen de 2 heures
Voir mes services
Bêta-lecture
I will christian beta reader fantasy beta reader ya fiction beta reader book critique
Formatage
I will do print book formatting, novel formatting, fiction formatting
3 Avis
| (1) | ||
| (0) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (1) | ||
| (0) |
Détails de la notation
- Niveau de communication avec le freelance
- Qualité de la livraison
- Valeur de la livraison
1 à 3 avis sur 3
Trier par
Les plus pertinents
brandymarks07
États-Unis
Collaboration en cours
Working with Luz on my novel, Blood of Starlight, was one of the best decisions I made during the editing process. Her beta reader report was exceptionally thorough and insightful. Rather than offering only general impressions, she carefully evaluated each chapter’s characters, relationships, worldbuilding,...
Réponse du freelance
Utile?
brandymarks07
États-Unis
Collaboration en cours
Her beta read was excellent and provided helpful insight. Unfortunately, the copyediting and proofreading did not meet a professional standard. We had agreed on a total price of $500 for my approximately 85,000-word manuscript, and I understood that this price included both copyediting and proofreading....
Réponse du freelance
Utile?
brandymarks07
États-Unis
Collaboration en cours
I thank the freelancer for the additional work she put into Parts 1 and 2. The revised approach was substantially better and much closer to what I originally expected. However, I still found missing spaces, unresolved grammar and wording problems, and visible editing artifacts. Therefore, I cannot consider...
Utile?
